Socal Locale

September 26, 2007

How do I get involved in politics?

southern california politics
dpsullivan asked:


Can anyone suggest where I can get started so that eventually I will get into a paid position? What I mean is that I’m not just looking for an extracurricular activity. I live in Southern California.

Powered by Yahoo Answers

September 24, 2007

I would really like to know what you think about this article?

Filed under: Southern California Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 11:43 am
southern california politics
retiredguy5203 asked:


I read it and i don’t know how to take it. Could this be what is happing here in the USA??? thank you for your thoughts
A Warning for America
from South Africa
By Gemma Meyer
(Gemma Meyer is the pseudonym of a South African journalist. She and her husband, a former conservative member of parliament, still reside in South Africa.)

eople used to say that South Africa was 20 years behind the rest of the Western world. Television, for example, came late to South Africa (but so did pornography and the *** rights movement).

Today, however, South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country.

America’s structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates. But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your Western character.

Writing letters to the press, manning stands at county fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing your Congressman - that is what you know, and what you are comfortable with. Those are the political methods you’ve created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability.

But woe to you if - or more likely, when - the rules change. White Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America. Unable to cope with the new rules of the game - violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusations of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial numbers, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power from the haves - Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in. They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.

That is exactly what happened in South Africa. I know, because I was there and I saw it happen.

Faced with revolution in the streets, strikes, civil unrest and the sheer terror and murder practiced by Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress (ANC), the white government simply capitulated in order to achieve peace.

Westerners need peace. They need order and stability. They are builders and planners. But what we got was the peace of the grave for our society.

The Third World is different - different peoples with different pasts and different cultures. Yet Westerners continue to mistake the psychology of the Third World and its peoples. Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe are perfect examples of those mistakes. Sierra Leone is in perpetual civil war, and Zimbabwe - once the thriving, stable Rhodesia - is looting the very people (the white men) who feed the country. Yet Westerners do not admit that the same kind of savagery could come to America when enough immigrants of the right type assert themselves. The fact is, Americans are sitting ducks for Third World exploitation of the Western conscience of compassion.

Those in the West who forced South Africa to surrender to the ANC and its leaders did not consider Africa to be the dangerous, corrupt, and savage place it is now in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Those Western politicians now have a similar problem looming on their own doorsteps: the demand for power and treasure from the non-Western peoples inside the realm.

It is already too late for South Africa, but not for America if enough people strengthen their spine and take on the race terrorists, the armies of the politically correct and, most dangerous of all, the craven politicians who believe compassionate conservatism will buy them a few more votes, a few more days of peace.

White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own *******. We are not so very different from you.

We lost our country through skillful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of oppression and racism, and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles’ heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the equality of man, and his love your neighbor philosophy - none of which are part of the Third World’s history.

The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Today’s tyrants were yesterday’s mission-school proteges. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the brotherhood of man.

Other tyrants, like the infamous Idi Amin, were trained and schooled by the whites themselves, at Oxford, Cambridge, and Harvard. After receiving the best from the West, they unleashed a resentful bloodlust against their benefactors.

From what I have seen and read thus far, I fear Americans will capitulate just as we did. Americans are, generally, a soft lot. They don’t want to quarrel or obstruct the claims of those who believe they were wronged. They like peace and quiet, and they want to compromise and be nice.

A television program that aired in South Africa showed a town meeting somewhere in Southern California where people met to complain about falling standards in the schools. Whites who politely spoke at the meeting clearly resented the influx of Mexican immigrants into their community. When a handful of Chicanos at the back of the hall shouted and waved their hands at them, the whites simply shrank back into their seats rather than tell the noisemakers to shut up. They didn’t want to quarrel.

In America, the courts are still the final arbiters of society’s laws. But what will happen when your future majority refuses to abide by court rulings - as in Zimbabwe. What will happen when the new majority says the judges are racists, and that they refuse to acknowledge white man’s justice? What will happen when the courts are filled with their people, or their sympathizers? In California, Proposition 187 has already been overturned.

What will you do when the future non-white majority decides to change the names of streets and cities? What will you do when they no longer want to use money that carries the portraits of old, dead white racists and slave owners? Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? What about the national anthem? Your official language?

Don’t laugh. When the majority took over in South Africa, the first targets were our national symbols.

In another generation, America may well face what Africa is now experiencing - invasions of private land by the have-nots; the decline in health care quality; roads and buildings in disrepair; the banishment of your history from the education of the young; the revolutionization of your justice system.

In South Africa today, only 9 percent of murderers end up in jail. Court dockets are regularly purchased and simply disappear. Magistrates can be bribed as can the prison authorities, making escapes commonplace. Vehicle and airplane licenses are regularly purchased, and forged school and university certificates are routine.

What would you think of the ritual slaughter of animals in your neighbor’s backyard? How do you clean up the blood and entrails that litter your suburban streets? How do you feel about the practice of witchcraft, in which the parts of young girls and boys are needed for medicinal purposes? How do you react to the burning of witches?

Don’t laugh. All that is quite common in South Africa today.

Don’t imagine that government officials caught with their fingers in the till will be punished. Excuses - like the need to overcome generations of white racism - will be found to exonerate the guilty.

In fact, known criminals will be voted into office because of a racial solidarity among the majority that doesn’t exist among the whites. When Ian Smith of the old Rhodesia tried to stand up to the world, white South African politicians were among the Westerners pressuring him to surrender.

When Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe murders his political opponents, ignores unfavorable court decisions, terrorizes the population and siphons off millions from the state treasury for himself and his friends, South Africa’s new President Thabo Mbeki holds his hand and declares his support. That just happened a few weeks ago.

Your tax dollars will go to those who don’t earn and don’t pay. In South Africa, organizations that used to have access to state funds such as old age homes, the arts, and veterans’ services, are simply abandoned.

What will happen is that Western structures in America will be either destroyed from without, or transformed from within, used to suit the goals of the new rulers. And they will reign either through terror, as in Zimbabwe today, or exert other corrupt pressures to obtain, or buy votes. Once power is in the hands of aliens, don’t expect loyalty or devotion to principle from those whose jobs are at stake. One of the most surprising and tragic components of the disaster in South Africa is how many previously anti-ANC whites simply moved to the other side.

Once you lose social, cultural, and political dominance, there is no getting it back again.

Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you. You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen. You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meetings. You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weaknesses and hacks off the arms and legs of his political opponents.

To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures. Above all, don’t put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall. You will probably fail.

Millions around the world want your good life. But make no mistake: They care not for the high-minded ideals of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, and your Constitution. What they want are your posessions, your power, and your status.

And they already know that their allies among you, the human rights activists, the skillful lawyers and the left-wing politicians will fight for them, and not for you. They will exploit your compassion and your Christian charity, and your good will.

They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well.

They know what to do.

Do you?

Powered by Yahoo Answers

September 23, 2007

How do you react to the news item:Spouse vs. spouse: Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama go for the unconventional

southern california politics
Udandaraogiri asked:


MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS
Spouse vs. spouse: Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama go for the unconventional
Posted on Fri, Feb. 01, 2008
BY MARGARET TALEV
mtalev@mcclatchydc.com

WASHINGTON — In one corner, at 6-foot-2, with the bulbous nose, the silver hair, the global resume and the I-feel-your-pain grin: former President Bill Clinton.

In the other, at 5-foot-11, as formidable and corporate as Hillary Clinton was in 1992 but more content and with a style and take on motherhood that’s Clair Huxtable-meets-Jackie Kennedy: Michelle Obama.

With the contest between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination threatening to drag on past Super Tuesday on Feb. 5, voters outside Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina may get to see how these unconventional candidate-spouses operate.

Bill Clinton needs no introduction, but Michelle Obama remains an unknown to many Americans, especially in the West.

”I’m embarrassed to say I don’t know as much about her,” said Jon Krosnick, a Stanford University professor who specializes in political psychology and has been observing how the Clintons campaign together.

Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama are far more involved, at least publicly, than are the wives of the two Republican front-runners, John McCain and Mitt Romney. Each is putting in heavy rotations on the surrogate campaign trail, although Obama still tries to be home evenings and weekends with the couple’s two young daughters.

Both spouses have mostly been assets for their respective campaigns, but if the lead-up to the Jan. 26 South Carolina primary was any indication, Mrs. Obama and Mr. Clinton may yet draw blood.

Months ago, Obama made what some read as a personal dig at Hillary Clinton, saying, ”If you can’t run your own house, you can’t run the White House.” Then, when Clinton stepped up his attacks on behalf of his wife and tried to put Barack Obama in the Jesse Jackson-black candidate box, Obama charged before the TV cameras to say that, “When power is confronted with real change, it will say anything.”

So far, Clinton has taken more media criticism — for his attempt to suggest that he never supported the Iraq war, for hogging so much of the spotlight that Barack Obama wondered aloud whom he was running against and for playing racial politics to limit the damage of his wife’s landslide loss in South Carolina, the first Southern state to vote.

Obama has gotten an easier ride. Her connection with black women may have helped turn out voters who once had been torn between her husband and Hillary Clinton. But some of Obama’s edgier comments could have exploded into controversy if she’d rolled them out before different audiences, say, during a general election campaign aimed at attracting swing voters.

Hillary Clinton was asked about her husband’s role at the Thursday night Democratic debate in California.

”He [Obama] has a spouse, too,” she replied.

”Thankfully Michelle is not on stage,” Barack Obama interjected. “I’m sure she could tell some stories as well.”

Clinton summed it up: “Well, one thing I think is fair to say: Both Barack and I have very passionate spouses. . . .”

”We do, no doubt,” Obama said.

”. . . who promote and defend us at every turn. . . . But the fact is that I’m running for president, and this is my campaign,” Clinton declared, to applause.

Michelle Obama’s frustration at the personal and career sacrifices she’s making for her husband is palpable, even though she says she’s willing to give up something for the opportunity to leave a mark on history. And her calculation to put her husband in his place at times, talking publicly about his sloppiness or how their daughters find him too stinky in the morning, isn’t something you’d expect from, say, Lady Bird Johnson or Laura Bush.

Krosnick said that Bill Clinton and Obama reflect “an increasing trend toward spouses being involved in campaigns. I think it’s a reflection of the women’s movement. Women are running major corporations now. It’s something that is just a fact of life, so the idea that smart effective politicians would be married to smart, effective professionals who don’t just sit quietly at home, that’s going to be normal.”

Both trained as lawyers, Clinton and Obama are verbally adept, with the ability to scathe, uplift or empathize on and off-script.

But either spouse could become a liability, Krosnick said, especially in the general election — Clinton because of how much Republicans revile him and Obama because she’s unpredictable and doesn’t have much experience in the national spotlight.

”As this thing goes on, every single word becomes vital,” Krosnick said.

Carl Sferrazza Anthony, a biographer of first ladies and historian for the National First Ladies’ Library in Canton, Ohio, said that Clinton and Obama both are ”pivotal” figures in their spouses’ campaigns.

But he sees them as fundamentally different.

Anthony considers Obama a grounding force for her husband. Growing up in a working-class black Chicago neighborhood, her experience as an African American is more typical than Barack Obama’s biracial childhood in Hawaii and Indonesia. Her ascendancy to Harvard Law School and the business world, as a hospital executive, arguably is more hard-won.

While her biography may be atypical for a candidate’s spouse, her style on the trail isn’t unprecedented. Anthony sees strains of Florence Harding, who brought her experiences as a divorcee and businesswoman to the trail in advocating her husband’s understanding of women’s challenges in 1920. Anthony also sees strains of Jackie Kennedy and Hillary Clinton in Obama.

Clinton’s experience as a past president and his political acumen are unprecedented in a candidate’s spouse, Anthony said. In contrast, he said, Obama seems interested in public policy, but “I don’t think she has a natural instinctive interest in the art of politics at all. I don’t think she has been politically ambitious.”

A Pew poll last October found that Clinton’s presence could cut both ways in his wife’s campaign. Asked whether his influence on a Hillary Clinton presidency would be a positive or a negative, most people considered him a plus, 64 percent to 19 percent. But asked whether they liked the idea of Clinton being back in the White House, Americans had a more divided reaction, with 45 percent saying they liked the idea and 33 percent disliking it.

How would America receive a first lady Michelle Obama? Pollsters say they don’t know. Neither national polling groups nor Illinois organizations have been asking, and Obama’s own aides say they’re not aware of any data on her favorability.

After Super Tuesday, however, if Barack Obama’s ahead, you can be sure such polls will emerge.

Powered by Yahoo Answers

Powered by WordPress

Energy Smart